You are currently browsing the monthly archive for August 2013.
The beards are back for the fourth season of cable TV’s highest rated reality show. Here are nine more things you should know about the faith of the Robertson clan (see also the original 9 things post).
1. Why Duck Dynasty matters: Poised to be the biggest cable show of all time,Duck Dynasty is the highest rated show on TV to consistently portray a family that is unapologetic about their Christian faith and their affection for one another. The pop culture phenomenon is making it harder for television executives to ignore the demand for shows that portray families who put God first in their lives.
2. Jase and Missy Robertson on the Biblical view of marriage…
“What do I wish someone had told me before seminary?” Perhaps this question was on the mind of Samuel Pearce (1766-1799) when he sat down to answer an overdue letter to a young man preparing to enter the Bristol Baptist Academy in 1798.
Pearce, though too humble to admit it, was more than qualified to supply an answer. He was the beloved pastor of Cannon Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, England, and he had recently helped establish the Baptist Missionary Society that sent William Carey to India.
When Pearce sought to join Carey overseas, the BMS executive committee denied his request due to his significance to the mission in England. Pearce accepted the committee’s decision humbly and continued to minister faithfully, but soon developed a fatal illness. According to his close friend, Andrew Fuller, Pearce maintained “a constant aim to promote the highest degrees of piety in himself and others” to the end of his life.
When Pearce penned this letter to a young seminary student, he had been sick for several months. He would preach his final sermon to his dear congregation in less than three weeks. His time on earth was drawing to a close, and he was aware of his pending death. What advice would a dying minister give to a young seminarian? Here is a summary of Pearce’s letter.
1. Cultivate Personal Spiritual Disciplines
Without the guidance of a “warm piety,” Pearce warned, you are likely to “pursue trivial and unworthy objects,” or worse, pursue worthy endeavors “for a wrong end.” Interestingly, the student to whom Pearce wrote would be expelled from the Bristol Academy for immorality, an historical detail that underlines the significance of this advice.
2. Submit to Your Professors
The opportunity to increase your knowledge carries the temptation to become puffed up with pride. To combat this inevitable enticement, Pearce would have you to submit to your teachers in humility and avoid sowing discord among your classmates.
3. Practice Self-Control
Seminaries are full of men and women preparing for ministry—young men and women, who will undoubtedly bear some marks of immaturity. Pearce recognized this danger and challenged his young friend to govern himself wisely, lest he develop a “light or trifling spirit” in such a youthful environment.
4. Be Wise with Your Time
Pearce advised, “Let every hour have its proper pursuit.” For many, seminary is secondary to various primary commitments such as family, ministry, or full-time employment. Pearce advocated for setting aside time throughout the week to effectively accomplish your various responsibilities and then sticking to the plan unless you find a way to “employ it to better advantage.”
5. Pursue Excellence
Pearce challenged the seminary student to pursue excellence in his studies because, “The hours at such a place are precious beyond conception, till the student enters on life’s busy scenes.” Seminary can be a busy season, but that is no excuse for giving second-rate effort.
The news coming out of Egypt is overwhelming. Radical Islamists are targeting Christians.
There are reports that Muslim Brotherhood supporters marked the doors of Christian homes to know which ones to attack during riots. Christian nunshave been paraded through the streets like prisoners of war – a public degradation of humanity. Churches have been indiscriminately burned to the ground – one had to cancel its first service in over 1,600 years. The number of churches attacked in the recent radical Islamic rampage has risen to at least 60 and by some estimates over 100.
Christians are being targeted and killed as the world watches in near silence. The Washington Times put it bluntly, “[T]his systematic attempt to eradicate Christians along with Jews is nothing less than ethnic cleansing.”
Do we care?
President Obama merely mentioned, “We believe that … the rights of … religious minorities should be respected . . . .”
That’s it? Is that all we will say?
Christians are being systematically targeted. Islamic radicals are blaming Christians for Egypt’s problems to stir up more violence and retribution – reminiscent of Nero. Christians are being murdered and their churches burned because of their faith.
And “respect” is all our President can muster to urge?
If the open slaughter and abuse of Christians in Egypt doesn’t turn your stomach, boil your blood, and raise to the level of defiant indignation – righteous anger – in your soul, what have we become?
If President Obama refuses to speak out, will you? If world leaders cower is silence, will you? If the mainstream media ignores the plight of Egypt’s Christians, will you?
We cannot. We must not. We must strive with every fiber of our being to raise the alarm – to stand up with one voice and demand that Christians be protected.
Egypt is home to the largest population of Christians in the Middle East, making up 10% of the population of that nation. That’s 8 million Christians facing brutal persecution. If this is happening in broad daylight in Egypt, imagine what happens in nations where there are only a few hundred or thousand Christians.
As Dietrich Bonhoeffer once said, “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.”
Will you be silent? Will you act?
In previous posts, we began to answer the question if Dietrich Bonhoeffer should be considered a “martyr” in the traditional way that Christians understand martyrdom?
Even while the dust of was settling, Reinhold Niebuhr was hailing Bonhoeffer as a martyr whose story belonged amongst “the modern Acts of the Apostles.” Bishop George Bell of Chichester, Bonhoeffer’s chief contact in the ecumenical movement, echoed Niebuhr’s sentiments as he recounted the background of the Hitler plot (30).
Was Dietrich Bonhoeffer a “martyr” in the traditional way that Christians understand martyrdom?
Upon his return from New York in 1939, Bonhoeffer involved himself in various acts of subterfuge against the German government, and as an active member of the Abwehr he participated in tyrannicide by plotting to assassinate Adolf Hitler. It was for his participation in this treasonous conspiracy that he was ordered hanged by the Gestapo. The Gestapo saw only his “high treason.” On the surface at least, Bonhoeffer’s Christian conviction in the matter seem to have been an irrelevant fact in the immediate circumstances of his death. Hence this final and highly politicized period of his life (1939-1945) renders ambiguous the relationship between his Christian confession and his death and thus calls into question the authenticity of his martyrdom when weighed against the traditional Christian understanding (29-30).
That popular version of Bonhoeffer’s death is explained below…
There was a “trial” that lasted through the night: “the prisoners were interrogated once more and confronted with one another. All were condemned.”Early in the morning on April 9, 1945, Dietrich Bonhoeffer was executed by hanging. Bosanquet writes:
“So the morning came. Now the prisoners were ordered to strip. They were led down to a little flight of steps under the trees to the secluded place of execution. There was a pause. For the men about to die, time hung a moment suspended. Naked under the scaffold in the sweet spring of woods, Bonhoeffer knelt for the last time to pray. Five minutes later, his life was ended.”
The camp doctor was an eye-witness of Bonhoeffer’s final minutes:
“Through the half-door in one room of the huts I saw Pastor Bonhoeffer, before taking off his prison garb, kneeling on the floor praying fervently to his God. I was most deeply moved by the way this lovable man prayed, so devout and so certain that God heard his prayer. At the place of execution, he again said a short prayer and then climbed the steps of the gallows, brave and composed. His death ensued a few seconds. In the almost fifty years that I worked as a doctor, I have hardly seen a man die so entrirely submissive to the will of God.”
That version may be debatable according to Craig J. Slane in Bonhoeffer as Martyr…
The report, received by Wolf-Dieter Zimmermann, was written 4 April 1955 by H. Fischer-Hullstrung, a medical doctor who ostensibly had attended to the prisoners on that morning. But it may be as bogus as the trial that preceded the execution.
J. L. F. Mogensen, a Danish survivor of the Flossenburg camp, has taken the doctor’s account at several points, First, he notes that on the morning of the hangings the hangings were taken an usually long period of time, from about six o’clock until close at noon. He conjectures that that the reason for the length had to do with the torture technique sometimes used by the Nazis: to hang the victim with the tips of the toes touching the ground so as to prolong the death. When death drew near, the victim might be revived and the process repeated. Mogensen believes this practice would help to explain the prolonged nature of the killings. Second, he notes that the door to the execution area was always closed during killings. Even it it were left open by chance, there were no barrack buildings with a view of the place of execution. Third, he doubts weather the executioner would have allowed Bonhoeffer the uncommon privilege of kneeling and praying. This would have been outside normal procedures.
The camp doctor may have known what happened to Bonhoeffer and decided to create an alternative account in order to wash his hands of these deaths. Or he may not have been an eyewitness at all. It also remains possible that he is telling the truth and that Mogensen has misinterpreted his own experience in some way. At the very least, Fischer-Hullstrung had to have signed Bonhoeffer’s death certficate. Even so, the doctor’s report is losing its credibility among Bonhoeffer scholars and interpreters. The physical details of Bonhoeffer’s death may have been much more difficult than we earlier imagined. But aside from some kind of recantation, which is practically unthinkable, it is hard to imagine how the harrowing details of his final minutes or hours could make a real theological difference, though they might shape our psychological identification with him.